|
| Group: |
rec.sport.disc |
[ Post new message ] |
|
|
 |
| Author: |
jim |
| Subject: |
Re: MSSUI? |
| Body: |
On May 13, 3:32 pm, Handy <Jack.Han...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 13, 11:47 am, dude <consciousinfor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 13, 11:03 am, "Joe's Brother" <hot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > RIP MSSUI2008-2008
>
> > > On May 13, 11:18 am, adam wiseman <codyeandr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > There was more hype from MSSUI for Centex than Nationals. Can that be
> > > > right? The altitude is different, but what about the teams?
>
> > The field of teams at centex is stronger than the field at nationals.
> > Also, the seeds/pools were just posted Monday morning, a whopping 4
> > days before nationals. There isn't much time to hype, but since pools
> > were posted yesterday I would say it is still early for an article. I
> > bet they come up with some hype article by wed night.
>
> I'm so sick of this Centex stronger than Nationals thing. Even if
> it's true, ask Wisconsin and Florida what's more important, a Centex
> win or a Nationals win. Isn't Vegas technically the best field
> anyway, all the team from Centex + tons of others? Why doesn't that
> get more hype? Oh, because it's all about nationals, right.
I don't think any other tournament comes close to nationals in terms
of importance.
It would be nice if there was some sort of regular season where
tournamnets like Centex mattered more, but they really don't carry any
weight towards anything (maybe ranking, but that does not lead to
anything).
So it is "all about nationals".....no other tournament really matters.
|
|
|
|
| Topic: |
MSSUI? |
|
| Message: |
Author |
Date |
|
|
*Message 1* |
jim |
Tue, 13 May 2008, 12:44 pm |
|