|
| Group: |
uk.sci.weather |
[ Post new message ] |
|
|
 |
| Author: |
Dawlish |
| Subject: |
Re: 12:18 |
| Body: |
On May 16, 7:31=A0am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 16, 12:30 am, Weatherlawyer <Weatherlaw...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Big problem with trying to fix a location is that no one knows the
> > harmonics involved. How could they? I am the only one looking into it.
>
> > Look at this loop as of 2008-5-15-00:00 >https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/efs/=
cgi-bin/efs_loop.cgi?strt=3D0&incr=3D12&st...)
>
> > As of 00:00, there was a clearly defined High of some 15 to 20 degrees
> > diameter.
> > 12:00 and it is building, being fed by a stream from Canada.
> > 24:00 and it's breaking away again.
> > 36:00 Wow, look at that.
> > 48:00 Pwned.
> > 60:00 and it's back again.
>
> +24hrs and it looks like this:
>
> >http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/ensemble/charts_e.html?Hour=3D0&Day=3D0&Ru=
....
>
> Talk about hanging on by a thread. It couldn't be more circumspect if
> it were reading my posts. But I'll get the bugger yet! You just wait.
No, W; that's the wrong word..........."you'll GUESS the bugger yet".
And you will. And you'll claim you predicted it, despite your previous
prediction success statistics showing, quite clearly, that your
theories are not rooted in reality.
|
|
|
|
|